Thin Client Performance
Ever since Thin Clients were conceived the message has always been that unlike PC’s the CPU on the Thin Client is unimportant. The concept this comes from is that the Server is doing most of the work and therefore the horsepower needs to be there. The Thin Client in this case is merely animating the screen content and sending the keyboard and mouse data to the Server. What we have seen however is that there are many instances where the performance of the Thin Client does make a big difference to the end user experience even when using Terminal Server or Citrix.
Applications on the server which use multimedia
in particular are impacted by low performance
Thin Clients. In recent tests we carried out the
lower spec Thin Clients were simply unable to
keep up with the demands for sound and vision at
the same time. Even PowerPoint was enough to
show up problems. Embedded applications such as
5250 are particularly susceptible to poor CPU
performance. The OS is also an important
consideration here, on the more traditional
Ethernet terminals the CPU is often low speed,
however because they are running only machine
code, they perform well. These days end users
are looking to move from traditional Ethernet
terminals to Thin Clients, they are faced with
the choice of Linux, CE and XPe as a possible
way to go. Linux by far is the most efficient OS
for 5250, provided that the Thin Client has
enough power to run it. Linux requires a minimum
configuration before it starts to be efficient.
The manufacturer of the image for the Thin
Client can also make a difference, i.e. if the
creator of the image is also the creator of the
5250 program the priority given to the 5250 can
be tweaked. If the company who designs the image
uses a third party such as Ericom, no such
tweaking can be done. 5250 also suffers from
problems caused by terminating the power before
the 5250 session is closed.
BOSaNOVA is one of the very few companies who
terminate the 5250 session before powering down
the Thin Client. This is done with the New
Rabbit, the new 2.6 kernel on the LTC and any CE
or XPe Thin Client. The issue this addresses is
that users who were used to Twinax Terminals,
they could simply power off the device and the
AS/400 would know the device was no longer
communicating. With TCP/IP the AS/400 has a
logical session with the device, so both devices
are maintaining this conversation. If the user
powers of the device without first closing the
5250 session, the AS/400 still thinks the device
is in operation and will not release the session
to the device next time it is powered on.
For more information please contact us at 800-866-6267 or info@bosanova.net